🔥 Why is PokerStars so rigged? - Quora

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🎰

Filter:
Sort:
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Online poker players who suffer bad beats at PokerStars sometimes complain that the site is rigged, to the alleged scam or to get similar feedback from fellow players who also feel that PokerStars is rigged. Here's the Proof!


Enjoy!
Pokerstars Is Rigged!!!! Real Proof!!!! | PokerStars | 3nimfomanki.ru Forum
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

🎰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

The most probable proof is present in the Amazon book “pokerstars is rigged” or “​online poker scam” also on Amazon. Basically run good players hitting straight.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

🎰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Rihard4a: Okay guys, me and my fellow poker player study group came to conclusion that stars is rigged. This is for real, no joke. Just take a.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

🎰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Rihard4a: Okay guys, me and my fellow poker player study group came to conclusion that stars is rigged. This is for real, no joke. Just take a.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

🎰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

3nimfomanki.ru › Why-is-PokerStars-so-rigged.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

🎰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

If you have proof, please point to it. Poker sites have little to gain with rigged games. It is easy for people to think games are rigged because our minds are selective.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

🎰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Online poker players who suffer bad beats at PokerStars sometimes complain that the site is rigged, to the alleged scam or to get similar feedback from fellow players who also feel that PokerStars is rigged. Here's the Proof!


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

🎰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

3nimfomanki.ru › poker › comments › proof_pokerstars_is_rigged.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

🎰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

I know the myth around the "rigged" -stuff. But this myth has facts in it. It's funny when players claim that those who accuse PS of rigging the game.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

🎰

Software - MORE
A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

I know the myth around the "rigged" -stuff. But this myth has facts in it. It's funny when players claim that those who accuse PS of rigging the game.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
pokerstars rigged proof

Again, I jumped into calculating the probability. In fact, any frequency, any indicator, any parameter I was regularly checking did not seem right: from the frequency of triple pair situations to the one of flopping at least a set when holding a pocket pair; or from the conversion rate of my flopped flush draws into flushes up to the recorded rate of winning as a favorite on the turn calculated as a percentage of the expected rate indicated by my equity. Whenever I was losing too much money on these little experiments at the lowest 2. Moreover, despite those awkward events that I had occasionally witnessed on the platform, I thought my training was going better than I hoped for: I had more than doubled my initial stack of play-money, gaining almost 20k big blinds in a couple of months. Simultaneously, every day I kept re- studying the game theoretically, devouring every book or article I could get my hands on: the psychology of the game, video analysis, the tactics, the mathematics. Time passed, with me occasionally playing the game with friends, until I got to university. KK vs. One cannot put a price tag on it. Or vice versa, can't say exactly. With no effort of readapting to everything a real money game supposes, things were going smoothly. All the players still actively engaged in online poker deserve the truth. Eight to ten, sometimes twelve or more hours a day. It is at least something for sure: a pioneering effort. Almost another decade passed yet again, with me playing the game on maybe a handful of occasions, live, among friends, before I once again returned to poker, but this time in more serious manner. Things seemed a little bit dubious, but all my theoretical and practical knowledge of probabilities, my very background of a researcher made me 'know better': the sample of hands played was still arguably small, randomness in nature implies even such "accidents", overall the figures could have been normalized, etc. It is not, strictly speaking, an academic paper, since it does not fully comply with the rigors of academic writing1. I revisited all the hundreds of allegations and complaints already read and explored other thousands of new ones. Gradually, the popularity of the game decayed worldwide. I ended up having played over 55k. I had seen some of the most improbable flops imaginable, the kind of one in tens of millions of hands. I had for instance already been through Aces vs. Afterwards the methods and items to be tested were expanded and refined. Somewhere along the way, probably half way through my series of 55k hands played on real money, I gave up entirely any intention of making money on the platform. Thus, we got to enjoy plenty of "sensational" duels Aces full of Jacks vs. The following presents this research. And the more I played, the more showdowns I got to see, and I discovered new anomalies. I asked myself: do I still need this? Thus, contrary to what any rational poker player would do, I started calling my opponents tens of times, despite all the signals telling me I was already beaten, only to reach showdown, so that I could check if another "accident", like AA vs. Only this time solely on play-money: I felt I had gotten older, or shall we say 'matured', and didn't need the adrenalin of real money anymore. Some of them were so truly grotesque, that I instantly screen-shot them, posting of few on my social media accounts. Nowadays, they seem to be called "coolers" and omnipresent on online poker sites. However, despite everything going according to plan, I couldn't stop noticing that I had already witnessed some truly horrendous "accidents" in terms of anything that a genuinely "random" generator of numbers would actually suppose. All of a sudden, everywhere I looked around, it seemed the whole planet was playing Hold'em! In hindsight, it seems like that kind of first love that one, unable, or unwilling, to forget, keeps returning to repeatedly over a lifetime. In parallel, I met with friends on poker nights. It was fun! The next day or so, at a six-players table, three players had been dealt hole cards of the same suit, all of them eventually making a flush. In retrospect, maybe it was the fact that I had ended the session on a little profit that made me not pay much attention to some otherwise suspect events. Let's put it like this for the moment: it's none of these entirely, but it's simultaneously both of them. I remember first trying the game back when I was a kid, maybe eleven-twelve years old. But, still, I had barely restarted playing, right, and accidents do indeed happen in nature, right? Nowadays there are so many versions of the game, one can hardly keep track of them. I once again returned to the thousands of complains spread all over the Internet, this time evaluating them in a more applied manner and trying to reformulate them in the form of statistically verifiable hypotheses. True love, what can I say! I downloaded the Pokerstars platform, the first one I found on the Internet, and I started playing again. Within pair vs. Eventually, the researcher's voice prevailed. My new goal was clear: produce a serious, solid, statistically-based investigation of how truly "random" Pokerstars' algorithm is dealing the cards. As a sample volume, I targeted a number of 50k hands played. Specialized sports' TV stations were broadcasting tournaments or high stakes cash games, there was talk everywhere about some hand Ivey had won against Antonius, Negreanu was becoming the most popular player around, the "Poker Brat" was having a problem with Northern European players to the amusement of TV viewers worldwide, and it seemed that everyday a new poker platform popped up on the Internet.

The story My relationship to poker has been a sinuous one for as far as I remember. Despite thousands, if not tens of thousands, of complaints spread all pokerstars rigged proof the Internet about online poker in general, and the Pokerstars platform as a case see more particular, being "rigged", so far, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no single attempt, by a truly independent source2, at providing a rigorous, extensive, and ideally credible demonstration of one or more of the accusations formulated in social media discussions.

In petty terms, let's put it like this: at the end of this enterprise, my net financial loss, all things considered, barely amounted to USD It has been one of the most profitable investments I could have possibly made: it has led to a research that represents, to the best of my knowledge, the first statistical investigation of an online poker platform done by an external and truly independent source and simultaneously made freely available to anyone in the world.

And things on Pokerstars did indeed pokerstars rigged proof a little "fishy", to say the least. It is exactly the nature and scope of such a line of questioning and its implicit methodological issues raised that may explain why, from this very beginning and all the way through its four chapters up to the Conclusions, this undertaking may look like something totally unusual.

It did make me raise an eyebrow, but, again, this accident was also "possible", as 1. Above anything else though, the truth is the truth. It lasted for about two years. Most crucially: how does one actually establish whether it is rigged or not?

Nah, barely played it the last two years, and most likely won't need it anymore. Kings duels twice as often than normal at a 6players table.

Still, I was torn. A quadruple targeted analysis of Pokerstars' flops Pair vs. I also vividly remember how, in order to make every hand more spectacular, more adrenalin-laden, like the ones we saw in the movies, we used to eliminate from the deck all cards lower than seven.

Another day, in another session, I bumped into a higher pocket pair three of the five times. Then time passed again, with me getting older, marrying, getting a job - you know, the usual stuff.

I was playing with my cousin - the classic five cards draw. Feeling a bit rusty after the prolonged break, I re-installed the Pokerstars application and granted myself about two months of playing on virtual, playmoney, to get back in shape, before jumping to real-money games.

As a consequence, all that remained essentially within the realm of public debate has been something like a dialogue of the deaf: demoralized players, thousands of them deserting Pokerstars in recent years, kept accusing the platform of being pokerstars rigged proof, while the latter's representatives kept delivering the same, already standardized, excuses as answers, such as: online, people play far more games than in real life, so pokerstars rigged proof those terrible "accidents" invoked by so many critics would in fact be only natural to occur over so many article source people tend to remember only, or to a higher rate at least, those situations when they were unlucky, and not also the ones where they have been lucky; the samples of hands gathered as evidence by one or another criticizing player have been too small to allow any reliable generalizations, etc.

Things went on and after a good ten thousand hands played, I was on profit, and in full line with my elaborated plan of gradually moving up through the stakes in order to cash in enough to pay the entry fees at live tournaments. But let's not go there, yet. My inner voice of a researcher kept telling me that at least some of the events witnessed were hard to classify as anything closely related to randomness, and that the situation definitely needed to be investigated scientifically, while the voice of the poker player in me pushed me to keep playing, to win more money and follow my initial plan. And, on second thought: what would "rigged" mean, precisely? On the basis of my mere 10k hands played, plus other over 60k played on play-money, I could relate to many of them. But nor is it an investigative, non-academic, report, since all concepts, methods and instruments employed are entirely and directly transferred from the academic, scientific world. I went back to what still seemed like nothing more than online hearsay. One day, I remember replacing my desktop computer with a new one, when noticing the poker application on the old one. A few minutes later, however, my pocket Queens defeated the opposition Aces. All these elements considered, I threw in a couple hundred dollars not more, given my remnant suspicions , then also bought online a poker data-analysis software, and started playing against the "grinders" at the lowest stakes levels. Admittedly, the first time during this training period that I lost three times in a row holding pocket Kings, it felt a bit awkward, and even more so after I calculated the probability of this chain of "accidents" happening. And if the game on a poker platform is rigged, then the truth has to be known. Back then, it was the only type of poker we knew. It was simply impossible for me to resist the temptation. True, already on my first day of playing April the 9th , I flopped directly an Aces full, then I lost with pocket Queens against KJ off-suite, the opponent flopping a trip of Kings, but only eight minutes later, I was once again dealt pocket Queens, this time winning the pot, etc. We engaged in the most passionate relationship possible. Gradually, the design of the research was outlined. And so on, for the whole two months or so of training. All the way to the WSOP series! Convincing enough for me to dismiss all of the online allegations that were claiming online poker in general and Pokerstars in particular would be "rigged", allegations that I had begun finding on the Internet, I didn't find any solid, scientific and therefore credible demonstration of such preposterous-seeming claims. We had all bought one or another version of a poker kit, and played whenever we could, as a hobby. The next day, I lost with Aces against Kings, on the river. There, and then, I rediscovered poker. And my pre-flop all-ins were completely off the charts, the majority of them having an outcome contrary to the mathematically normal and expected one. As a final step taken during the last three days of playing, I even engaged into a full-scale experiment over more than 2. The game of poker - that kind of first love that one cannot or will not forget, deserves the truth. What was being said there had also happened to me! Contents I.